Law & Legal
A Law Abiding Citizen, A Law Abiding Citizen Cast, A Law Or Regulation, A Lawful Permanent Resident, A Lawless Street, A Lawyer, A Lawyer Who Represents Himself, A Lawyer Writes, B Law 301, B Law Class, B Law Firm, B Law Quizlet, B Lawrence Homes, B Laws Ukzn, B Laws Unizulu, B Lawyer, C Lawler Rogers, C Lawrence, C Lawrence Realty Sikeston Mo, Law Abiding Citizen, Law And Order 2022, Law And Order Cast, Law And Order Criminal Intent, Law And Order Organized Crime, Law And Order Svu, Law And Order Svu Cast, Law Balance Scale, Law Band, Law Bar Exam, Law Bird, Law Books, Law Books For Sale, Law Boss, Law By Mike, Law Careers, Law Clerk, Law Clerk Salary, Law Colleges, Law Conservation Of Energy, Law Conservation Of Mass, Law Conservation Of Matter, Law Crossing, Law Of Conservation Of Energy, Law Of Conservation Of Mass, Law Of Cosines, Law School, Lawn Mower, Lawrence Taylor, Lawyers Near Me
Shamika W. Patrick
0 Comments
Jolyon Claims Credit for Downing Street Fines… Met Say Absolutely Not
[ad_1]

Jolyon Claims Credit for Downing Street Fines… Met Say Absolutely Not
Following the announcement of Boris, Rishi and Carrie’s FPN this afternoon, Jolyon Maugham put out an astonishing tweet claiming credit for the fines.
A reminder that the Met was absolutely adamant that it would not investigate criminality at Number 10. It was only after @GoodLawProject sued them that they changed their mind. We are very pleased we did – and grateful to all who supported our action.
— Jo Maugham (@JolyonMaugham) April 12, 2022
He’s since repeated this ego-inflating claim in the Independent, who lapped up his absurd spin by commissioning an op-ed entitled “we forced the Met to investigate No. 10 on Partygate – today we brought justice”. Just one problem – not only is this bollocks, the Met has confirmed it to be so.
In a document available via the Good Law Project’s own site, the Metropolitan Police point out that the campaign group’s judicial review claim had no impact on its decision to investigate Partygate, a direct contradiction of Jolyon’s masturbatory claim today.
“For the avoidance of doubt the recent decision was not caused in any way by the instant judicial review claim
“Second, and significantly, the decision of 8 December 2021 was never a final decision. The Defendant made clear to the claimant… that if new information came to light, in particular as a result of the investigations being carried out on behalf of the Cabinet Office by Sue Gray, then the Defendant would decide afresh whether to open an investigation into the alleged gatherings… That is precisely what happened in this case…
This claim was always premature. Despite that fact being made clear the Claiminat still chose to issue this claim.
This man knows no shame…
[ad_2]
Source link