Skip to content
jdean-law

jdean-law

Politics and lawyers

Primary Menu jdean-law

jdean-law

  • Legal Aid Society
  • Law & Legal
  • News Legal
  • Law Firm
  • Politics
  • About Us
    • Advertise Here
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap
  • News Legal

SCOTUS Rules Emotional Distress Damages Unavailable in Rehabilitation Act or the Affordable Care Act Actions

Shamika W. Patrick June 20, 2022

[ad_1]

In Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C., 596 U.S. __ (2022), the U.S. Supreme Court held that emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or the Affordable Care Act. 

Facts of the Case

Jane Cummings, who is deaf and legally blind, sought physical therapy services from Premier Rehab Keller and asked Premier Rehab to provide an American Sign Language interpreter at her sessions. Premier Rehab declined to do so, telling Cummings that the therapist could communicate with her through other means.

Cummings subsequently filed a lawsuit seeking damages and other relief against Premier Rehab, alleging that its failure to provide an ASL interpreter constituted dis- crimination on the basis of disability in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Affordable Care Act. Premier Rehab is subject to these statutes, which apply to entities that receive federal financial assistance, because it receives reimbursement through Medicare and Medicaid for the provision of some of its services.

The District Court determined that the only compensable injuries allegedly caused by Premier Rehab were emotional in nature. It held that damages for emotional harm are not recoverable in private actions brought to enforce either statute. The District Court thus dismissed the complaint, and the Fifth Circuit affirmed.

Supreme Court’s Decision

The Supreme Court affirmed. It held that emotional distress damages are not recoverable under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or the Affordable Care Act.

Writing on behalf of the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts explained that Congress has broad power under the Spending Clause of the Constitution to “fix the terms on which it shall disburse federal money.” Pursuant to that authority, Congress has enacted statutes prohibiting recipients of federal financial assistance from discriminating on the basis of certain protected characteristics. In Barnes v. Gorman, 536 U.S. 181 (2002), the Supreme Court held that such statutes may be enforced through implied rights of action. However, what types of remedies are available is less clear.

Because Spending Clause legislation operates based on consent, the Court has determined that the “legitimacy of Congress’ power” to enact such laws rests not on its sovereign authority, but on “whether the [recipient] voluntarily and knowingly accepts the terms of th[at] ‘contract.’” In Barnes, the Supreme Court held that the same contract analogy similarly limits “the scope of available remedies.” Thus, a particular remedy is available in a private Spending Clause action “only if the funding recipient is on notice that, by accepting federal funding, it exposes itself to liability of that nature.”

Based on the above precedent, Chief Justice Roberts stated that whether emotional distress damages are available under the statutes, turns on one question: “Would a prospective funding recipient, at the time it ‘engaged in the process of deciding whether [to] accept’ federal dollars, have been aware that it would face such liability? . . . If yes, then emotional distress damages are available; if no, they are not.”

The Supreme Court ultimately concluded that “Hornbook law” states that emotional distress is generally not compensable in contract. Accordingly, the Court can’t treat federal funding recipients as having consented to be subject to damages for emotional distress, and such damages are accordingly not recoverable. In reaching its decision, the Court rejected Cummings’ argument that traditional contract remedies do include damages for emotional distress, because there is an exception—put forth in some contract treatises—under which such damages may be awarded where a contractual breach is particularly likely to result in emotional disturbance.

As Chief Justice Roberts noted, Barnes necessarily concluded that the existence of an on-point exception to the general rule against punitive damages was insufficient to put funding recipients on notice of their exposure to that particular remedy. In this case, the majority found there was no reason why the Court—bound by Barnes—should reach a different result.

“The approach offered by Cummings, by contrast, pushes the notion of ‘offer and acceptance,’ past its breaking point. It is one thing to say that funding recipients will know the basic, general rules. It is quite another to assume that they will know the contours of every contract doctrine, no matter how idiosyncratic or exceptional,” Roberts wrote. “Yet that is the sort of “clear notice” that Cummings necessarily suggests funding recipients would have regarding the availability of emotional distress damages when ‘engaged in the process of deciding whether’ to accept federal funds. Such a diluted conception of knowledge has no place in our Spending Clause jurisprudence.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Tags: J Law Baby, J Law Basketball, J Law Husband, J Law Pregnant, J Lawrence, J Lawrence Bethel, J Lawrence Hall, J Lawson, K Law 101, K Lawn, K Lawn Care, K Lawrence, K Lawrence Artist, K Lawson Wellington, K Lawson Younger, K Lawyers, L Lawliet, L Lawliet Age, L Lawliet Birthday, L Lawliet Fanart, L Lawliet Gif, L Lawliet Height, L Lawliet Iq, L Lawliet Real Name, Law Jd, Law Jobs Near Me, Law Jokes, Law Jolly Roger, Law Journal, Law Justia, Law Kannada Movie, Law Katana, Law Kdrama, Law Key Martin, Law Kid And Luffy, Law Kont, Law Librarian, Law Librarian Salary, Law Library, Law Library Hours, Law Library Near Me, Law Library Online, Law License, Law Logo, Law Majors, Law Making Process, Law Meaning, Law Motors, Law Movies

Continue Reading

Previous 10 years later, DACA program for 600,000 “Dreamers” remains in legal peril
Next Boebert taking legal action over ‘outlandish’ claims

More Stories

  • News Legal

Canada Immigration Plan – Target For Three Years Unveiled

Shamika W. Patrick June 5, 2023 0
  • News Legal

Six Steps For Negotiation Preparation

Shamika W. Patrick May 31, 2023 0
  • News Legal

The Legal System and Technology in the 21st Century

Shamika W. Patrick May 26, 2023 0
June 2023
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« May    

Archives

  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2018
  • January 2017

Recent Posts

  • Canada Immigration Plan – Target For Three Years Unveiled
  • Singapore Incorporation – General Factsheet
  • Yanhee General Hospital, Bangkok – More Details on Their Plastic Surgery Department (Part 2)
  • Employment Law Is Not Workers’ Compensation Law
  • Law Firm SEO Practice – Specific Sites

BL

Tags

In Law Law May Be Defined As Law Merit Badge Law Nail Polish Law Nation Law News Law Nurses Llc Law Ny Law Of Attraction Law Of Demand Law Of Independent Assortment Law Of Sines Law Of Surprise Law Pay Law Pay Login Law Pfp Law Pictures Law Professor Law Professor Jobs Law Professor Salary Law Public Safety Corrections And Security M Law 100 M Law Attorneys M Law Attorneys Apc M Law Firm M Lawn Care M Lawrence Mlaw Schedule N Lawndale Ave N Lawrence Ny N Lawrence Ohio N Lawrence St Philadelphia Pa Oh Law Oh Lawd Gif Oh Lawd He Comin Gif O Lawd I'M On My Way O Lawrence Hawthorne P Law Firm P Lawler Baseball P Lawler Enterprises P Lawrence P Lawson Artist P Lawson Travel P Lawyer Um Law Course Catalog

You may have missed

  • News Legal

Canada Immigration Plan – Target For Three Years Unveiled

Shamika W. Patrick June 5, 2023 0
  • general

Singapore Incorporation – General Factsheet

Shamika W. Patrick June 5, 2023 0
  • general

Yanhee General Hospital, Bangkok – More Details on Their Plastic Surgery Department (Part 2)

Shamika W. Patrick June 3, 2023 0
  • Law Firm

Employment Law Is Not Workers’ Compensation Law

Shamika W. Patrick June 2, 2023 0
  • Law Firm

Law Firm SEO Practice – Specific Sites

Shamika W. Patrick June 2, 2023 0
jdean-law.com | CoverNews by AF themes.

WhatsApp us