Friday, 01 July 2022
By Dr Despina Mavromati
In this modern football-associated course of action the Appellant—represented by legal counsel—had sent its assertion of attractiveness to the CAS by e-mail but unsuccessful to send out it by courier inside of the granted time limit, invoking drive majeure because of to the COVID-19 pandemic. The attraction was declared inadmissible by the CAS Division President. In the subsequent motion to set aside the CAS award, the SFT rejected the pressure majeure argument, thinking about that the Appellant was capable to reply to a CAS submission by article 1 working day immediately after its receipt, and that there was also the chance to file the submissions by electronic submitting. The SFT dismissed the attractiveness recalling the incredibly restricted scope of evaluation in case of non-compliance with the kind specifications and relevant time limits. See also the judgment 4A_416/2020.
An English translation of the judgment can be viewed underneath.
Keep on reading through this write-up…
Sign-up with your e-mail and password
Now a member? Sign in
Get accessibility to all of the skilled evaluation and commentary at LawInSport such as articles or blog posts, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Discover out far more in this article.
Dr Despina Mavromati
Despina Mavromati is a Swiss and Greek legal professional with substantial experience in worldwide athletics regulation and arbitration. She signifies athletes, clubs and federations and advises on all regulatory and sports activities governance matters, together with the recognition and enforcement of awards and freezing of property in Switzerland. Despina has acted as counsel, co-counsel, skilled or arbitrator in extra than 80 sports arbitrations, involving contractual, governance, doping-connected and other disciplinary and ethics issues.